On this page... (hide)

  1. 1. spins mollview lmax sims VS bins lmax
  2. 2. spins mollview lmax = 500
    1. 2.1 5.0 muK arccmin, r= 0.001
    2. 2.2 2.2 muK arccmin, r= 0.05
  3. 3. Spins mollview lmax = 50:
    1. 3.1 4 masks binnings [2,5,10,20,51]
    2. 3.2 3 masks binnings [2,10,20,51]
    3. 3.3 3 masks binnings (nside=1024) [2,10,20,51]
    4. 3.4 2 masks binnings [2,20,51]
    5. 3.5 2 masks binnings [2,30,51]

1.  spins mollview lmax sims VS bins lmax

[2.48.90.258.398.501] and lmax = 1000
[2.48.90.258.398.1001] and lmax = 1000
[2.48.90.258.398.501] and lmax = 500no images (lost), but worser results (trust me)
  • conclusion :
    • increasing lmax to pcg helpd producing better spin masks file. No need to push the binning to lmax thought.

2.  spins mollview lmax = 500

2.1  5.0 muK arccmin, r= 0.001

  • binning = [2,20,50,500]
  • eps PCG < 1e-9
bin1bin2bin3

2.2  2.2 muK arccmin, r= 0.05

bin1bin2bin3

3.  Spins mollview lmax = 50:

  • parameters
    • 5 muK.arcmin
    • r = 0.001

3.1  4 masks binnings [2,5,10,20,51]

 bin1bin2bin3bin4
err PCG 1e11e-91e-101e-10
spin0
spin1 real
spin2 re
spin1 im
spin2 im

3.2  3 masks binnings [2,10,20,51]

 bin 1bin 2bin3
err PCG 1e-41e-101e-10
spin0
re spin1
re spin2
im spin1
im spin2

3.3  3 masks binnings (nside=1024) [2,10,20,51]

 bin 1bin 2bin3
err PCG 1e-31e-41e-4
spin0
re spin1
re spin2
im spin1
im spin2

3.4  2 masks binnings [2,20,51]

 bin 1bin 2
err PCG1e-101e-10
spin0
im spin1
im spin2
re spin1
re spin2

3.5  2 masks binnings [2,30,51]

 bin 1bin 2
err PCG1e-101e-10
spin0
im spin1
im spin2
re spin1
re spin2