On this page... (hide)

  1.   1.  Xpure Vs Namaster
    1.   1.1  Full
    2.   1.2  gal band (fsky = 80 %)
    3.   1.3  pol cap (fsky = 80 %)
    4.   1.4  xpol on cap :
    5.   1.5  Boost nside for cap mask :

1.  Xpure Vs Namaster

Using 3 mask apodization (via namaster mask apodization routine) : {$ \theta_* = 5, 10, 30 ^\circ $}, we compre the results between Namaster (100000 simulations) and Xpure (~ 300 simulations) :

mean + std
combined std
  • Observation :
    • Std with xpure suing same Namaster masks produces the same biased spectra variance, especially the variance 'explosion' at low ell.
    • Same apodized mask produce different stds. Why ? ==>

Spectra using 1 cmb map :

apo=5°apo=10°apo=30°
  • observation :
    • spectra difference seems to decrease as apodization length increases

1.1  Full

pcl
cl

1.2  gal band (fsky = 80 %)

 apo=5.0apo=10.0apo=30.0
cl
pcl

1.3  pol cap (fsky = 80 %)

 apo=5.0apo=10.0apo=30.0
cl
pcl

1.4  xpol on cap :

 apo=5.0apo=10.0apo=30.0
cl
pcl

1.5  Boost nside for cap mask :

  • going from nside= 32 -> nside=128
  • lmax goes from 63 -> 255
 apo=5.0apo=10.0apo=30.0
cl
pcl
  • observation
    • NaMaster gives similar results
    • diff namaster/xpure less important.
    • does xpure suffers from pixelization effect ?
    • BB bias at low ells is stil present for low apodization lenght (known issue since first use of namaster -> bad mask apodization + derivative)